Corporate case law

Alarcón, Miguel Ángel c/ Distribuidora Juárez S.R.L. y otros s/ despido (National Commercial Court of Appeals, Chamber B, 17/06/2003)

The personal liability of directors and shareholders for fraud attributed to corporate conduct. The precedent considers, together, the rules on legal personality and the specific duties of corporate directors, while avoiding any conflation of organ-based liability with a general guarantee for every corporate debt.

CNCom., Sala B17/06/2003

Case caption

«Alarcón, Miguel Ángel c/ Distribuidora Juárez S.R.L. y otros s/ despido»

What was at issue

The personal liability of directors and shareholders for fraud attributed to corporate conduct.

What was decided

The precedent considers, together, the rules on legal personality and the specific duties of corporate directors, while avoiding any conflation of organ-based liability with a general guarantee for every corporate debt.

Extractable criterion

The precedent considers, together, the rules on legal personality and the specific duties of corporate directors, while avoiding any conflation of organ-based liability with a general guarantee for every corporate debt.
The holding should be read in light of the legal interest protected in the area of directors and non-opposability, not solely by reference to the documentary form of the act.
Evidence of the specific facts and of their impact on corporate or creditor rights is decisive when applying the precedent’s doctrine to another case.

Citation: CNCom., Sala B, «Alarcón, Miguel Ángel c/ Distribuidora Juárez S.R.L. y otros s/ despido», 17/06/2003 — Jurisprudencia societaria y comercial

Practical application

It is useful for separating claims under Section 54 of the LGS from direct actions seeking directors’ liability.

Frequently asked questions

What is the main takeaway from the case?

Does the rule apply automatically today?

No. The current statutory framework and the specific facts must be verified. Historical precedents retain doctrinal value, but later reforms may alter how they apply.

What should be proven in similar litigation?

The relevant corporate or commercial documentation, the parties’ conduct, the specific harm, and the facts connecting that harm to the central issue in the case: The personal liability of directors and shareholders for fraud attributed to corporate conduct.

Informational commentary on a published ruling; it does not constitute advice nor guarantee an outcome. Application to a case depends on its circumstances.

Do you need advice on this matter?

The firm is headquartered in Buenos Aires, Argentina, and advises clients worldwide.

Contact the firm