Corporate case law

Armas, Facundo y otros c/ Berceo Industrial y Comercial S.A. s/ convocatoria a asamblea (National Commercial Court of Appeals, Chamber A, 18/11/2022)

The current requirements for obtaining a court order convening a shareholders’ meeting. The Commercial Court of Appeals analyzed shareholder standing, the need for a prior demand, and the instrumental nature of judicial intervention: the court does not substitute for the shareholders’ decision, but enables them to meet.

CNCom., Sala A18/11/2022

Case caption

«Armas, Facundo y otros c/ Berceo Industrial y Comercial S.A. s/ convocatoria a asamblea»

What was at issue

The current requirements for obtaining a court order convening a shareholders’ meeting.

What was decided

The Commercial Court of Appeals analyzed shareholder standing, the need for a prior demand, and the instrumental nature of judicial intervention: the court does not substitute for the shareholders’ decision, but enables them to meet.

Extractable criterion

The Commercial Court of Appeals analyzed shareholder standing, the need for a prior demand, and the instrumental nature of judicial intervention: the court does not substitute for the shareholders’ decision, but enables them to meet.
The holding should be read in light of the legal interest protected in the area of judicially convened shareholders’ meetings, not solely by reference to the documentary form of the act.
Evidence of the specific facts and of their impact on corporate or creditor rights is decisive when applying the precedent’s doctrine to another case.

Citation: CNCom., Sala A, «Armas, Facundo y otros c/ Berceo Industrial y Comercial S.A. s/ convocatoria a asamblea», 18/11/2022 — Jurisprudencia societaria y comercial

Practical application

It is a recent precedent for urgent actions aimed at unblocking corporate governance.

Frequently asked questions

What is the main takeaway from the case?

Does the rule apply automatically today?

No. The current statutory framework and the specific facts must be verified. Historical precedents retain doctrinal value, but later reforms may alter how they apply.

What should be proven in similar litigation?

The relevant corporate or commercial documentation, the parties’ conduct, the specific harm, and the facts connecting that harm to the central issue in the case: The current requirements for obtaining a court order convening a shareholders’ meeting.

Informational commentary on a published ruling; it does not constitute advice nor guarantee an outcome. Application to a case depends on its circumstances.

Do you need advice on this matter?

The firm is headquartered in Buenos Aires, Argentina, and advises clients worldwide.

Contact the firm