Corporate case law

Diseño y Producciones S.R.L. c/ Compañía de Radiocomunicaciones Móviles S.A. s/ ordinario (National Commercial Court of Appeals, Chamber B, 22/09/2005)

The evidentiary value of invoices, accounting entries, and silence between merchants. The Commercial Court of Appeals treated commercial conduct and the failure timely to object to documentation as relevant evidence, without turning those circumstances into irrebuttable presumptions where contrary evidence exists.

CNCom., Sala B22/09/2005

Case caption

«Diseño y Producciones S.R.L. c/ Compañía de Radiocomunicaciones Móviles S.A. s/ ordinario»

What was at issue

The evidentiary value of invoices, accounting entries, and silence between merchants.

What was decided

The Commercial Court of Appeals treated commercial conduct and the failure timely to object to documentation as relevant evidence, without turning those circumstances into irrebuttable presumptions where contrary evidence exists.

Extractable criterion

The Commercial Court of Appeals treated commercial conduct and the failure timely to object to documentation as relevant evidence, without turning those circumstances into irrebuttable presumptions where contrary evidence exists.
The holding should be read in light of the legal interest protected in the area of invoices and accounting books, not solely by reference to the documentary form of the act.
Evidence of the specific facts and of their impact on corporate or creditor rights is decisive when applying the precedent’s doctrine to another case.

Citation: CNCom., Sala B, «Diseño y Producciones S.R.L. c/ Compañía de Radiocomunicaciones Móviles S.A. s/ ordinario», 22/09/2005 — Jurisprudencia societaria y comercial

Practical application

It is of direct practical use in B2B collection claims and accounting disputes.

Frequently asked questions

What is the main takeaway from the case?

Does the rule apply automatically today?

No. The current statutory framework and the specific facts must be verified. Historical precedents retain doctrinal value, but later reforms may alter how they apply.

What should be proven in similar litigation?

The relevant corporate or commercial documentation, the parties’ conduct, the specific harm, and the facts connecting that harm to the central issue in the case: The evidentiary value of invoices, accounting entries, and silence between merchants.

Informational commentary on a published ruling; it does not constitute advice nor guarantee an outcome. Application to a case depends on its circumstances.

Do you need advice on this matter?

The firm is headquartered in Buenos Aires, Argentina, and advises clients worldwide.

Contact the firm