Corporate case law

Medvedeff, Víctor c/ Yelda S.A. y otro s/ ordinario (National Commercial Court of Appeals, Chamber F, 19/03/2019)

Protection of shareholders’ rights in closely held companies and judicial review of challenged conduct by corporate bodies. The Commercial Court of Appeals applied the principles of good faith, corporate interest, and respect for shareholders’ political and economic rights in evaluating the conduct of corporate bodies.

CNCom., Sala F19/03/2019

Case caption

«Medvedeff, Víctor c/ Yelda S.A. y otro s/ ordinario»

What was at issue

Protection of shareholders’ rights in closely held companies and judicial review of challenged conduct by corporate bodies.

What was decided

The Commercial Court of Appeals applied the principles of good faith, corporate interest, and respect for shareholders’ political and economic rights in evaluating the conduct of corporate bodies.

Extractable criterion

The Commercial Court of Appeals applied the principles of good faith, corporate interest, and respect for shareholders’ political and economic rights in evaluating the conduct of corporate bodies.
The holding should be read in light of the legal interest protected in the area of corporate disputes, not solely by reference to the documentary form of the act.
Evidence of the specific facts and of their impact on corporate or creditor rights is decisive when applying the precedent’s doctrine to another case.

Citation: CNCom., Sala F, «Medvedeff, Víctor c/ Yelda S.A. y otro s/ ordinario», 19/03/2019 — Jurisprudencia societaria y comercial

Practical application

It is a contemporary precedent useful in minority-shareholder litigation.

Frequently asked questions

What is the main takeaway from the case?

The Commercial Court of Appeals applied the principles of good faith, corporate interest, and respect for shareholders’ political and economic rights in evaluating the conduct of corporate bodies.

Does the rule apply automatically today?

No. The current statutory framework and the specific facts must be verified. Historical precedents retain doctrinal value, but later reforms may alter how they apply.

What should be proven in similar litigation?

The relevant corporate or commercial documentation, the parties’ conduct, the specific harm, and the facts connecting that harm to the central issue in the case: Protection of shareholders’ rights in closely held companies and judicial review of challenged conduct by corporate bodies.

Informational commentary on a published ruling; it does not constitute advice nor guarantee an outcome. Application to a case depends on its circumstances.

Do you need advice on this matter?

The firm is headquartered in Buenos Aires, Argentina, and advises clients worldwide.

Contact the firm