Corporate case law

Ordas, Juan s/ concurso preventivo s/ incidente de revisión por Vanni, Juan (National Commercial Court of Appeals, Chamber C, 07/05/2013)

The creditor’s burden of proof in claim-review proceedings and the evidentiary value of private instruments or accounting records. The Commercial Court of Appeals examined proof of the basis and legitimacy of the claim under standards consistent with the collective nature of insolvency proceedings.

CNCom., Sala C07/05/2013

Case caption

«Ordas, Juan s/ concurso preventivo s/ incidente de revisión por Vanni, Juan»

What was at issue

The creditor’s burden of proof in claim-review proceedings and the evidentiary value of private instruments or accounting records.

What was decided

The Commercial Court of Appeals examined proof of the basis and legitimacy of the claim under standards consistent with the collective nature of insolvency proceedings.

Extractable criterion

The Commercial Court of Appeals examined proof of the basis and legitimacy of the claim under standards consistent with the collective nature of insolvency proceedings.
The holding should be read in light of the legal interest protected in the area of proof and allowance of claims, not solely by reference to the documentary form of the act.
Evidence of the specific facts and of their impact on corporate or creditor rights is decisive when applying the precedent’s doctrine to another case.

Citation: CNCom., Sala C, «Ordas, Juan s/ concurso preventivo s/ incidente de revisión por Vanni, Juan», 07/05/2013 — Jurisprudencia societaria y comercial

Practical application

It is directly useful in late-filed claim proceedings and review proceedings.

Frequently asked questions

What is the main takeaway from the case?

The Commercial Court of Appeals examined proof of the basis and legitimacy of the claim under standards consistent with the collective nature of insolvency proceedings.

Does the rule apply automatically today?

No. The current statutory framework and the specific facts must be verified. Historical precedents retain doctrinal value, but later reforms may alter how they apply.

What should be proven in similar litigation?

The relevant corporate or commercial documentation, the parties’ conduct, the specific harm, and the facts connecting that harm to the central issue in the case: The creditor’s burden of proof in claim-review proceedings and the evidentiary value of private instruments or accounting records.

Informational commentary on a published ruling; it does not constitute advice nor guarantee an outcome. Application to a case depends on its circumstances.

Do you need advice on this matter?

The firm is headquartered in Buenos Aires, Argentina, and advises clients worldwide.

Contact the firm