Corporate case law

Rafiki S.A. s/ quiebra s/ incidente de revisión por Cooperativa Activa Ltda. (National Commercial Court of Appeals, en banc, 28/02/2006)

When the period begins to run for seeking review of the decision on allowance of claims under Section 36 of the LCQ. Sitting en banc, the Commercial Court of Appeals resolved how the period under Section 37 of the LCQ is calculated and how it relates to notice, with the aim of ensuring uniformity and procedural certainty.

CNCom., en pleno28/02/2006

Case caption

«Rafiki S.A. s/ quiebra s/ incidente de revisión por Cooperativa Activa Ltda.»

What was at issue

When the period begins to run for seeking review of the decision on allowance of claims under Section 36 of the LCQ.

What was decided

Sitting en banc, the Commercial Court of Appeals resolved how the period under Section 37 of the LCQ is calculated and how it relates to notice, with the aim of ensuring uniformity and procedural certainty.

Extractable criterion

Sitting en banc, the Commercial Court of Appeals resolved how the period under Section 37 of the LCQ is calculated and how it relates to notice, with the aim of ensuring uniformity and procedural certainty.
The holding should be read in light of the legal interest protected in the area of proof and allowance of claims, not solely by reference to the documentary form of the act.
Evidence of the specific facts and of their impact on corporate or creditor rights is decisive when applying the precedent’s doctrine to another case.

Citation: CNCom., en pleno, «Rafiki S.A. s/ quiebra s/ incidente de revisión por Cooperativa Activa Ltda.», 28/02/2006 — Jurisprudencia societaria y comercial

Practical application

It is used daily in claim-review proceedings: a mistake in calculating the period may permanently forfeit the remedy.

Frequently asked questions

What is the main takeaway from the case?

Does the rule apply automatically today?

No. The current statutory framework and the specific facts must be verified. Historical precedents retain doctrinal value, but later reforms may alter how they apply.

What should be proven in similar litigation?

The relevant corporate or commercial documentation, the parties’ conduct, the specific harm, and the facts connecting that harm to the central issue in the case: When the period begins to run for seeking review of the decision on allowance of claims under Section 36 of the LCQ.

Informational commentary on a published ruling; it does not constitute advice nor guarantee an outcome. Application to a case depends on its circumstances.

Do you need advice on this matter?

The firm is headquartered in Buenos Aires, Argentina, and advises clients worldwide.

Contact the firm