Corporate case law

Romi S.R.L. s/ acuerdo preconcursal (National Commercial Court of Appeals, Chamber B, 31/10/2005)

The constitutionality, confirmation, and judicial review of an out-of-court restructuring agreement. The case emphasized that confirmation is not automatic: the court retains authority to review legality, voting majorities, treatment of creditors, and the absence of abuse.

CNCom., Sala B31/10/2005

Case caption

«Romi S.R.L. s/ acuerdo preconcursal»

What was at issue

The constitutionality, confirmation, and judicial review of an out-of-court restructuring agreement.

What was decided

The case emphasized that confirmation is not automatic: the court retains authority to review legality, voting majorities, treatment of creditors, and the absence of abuse.

Extractable criterion

The case emphasized that confirmation is not automatic: the court retains authority to review legality, voting majorities, treatment of creditors, and the absence of abuse.
The holding should be read in light of the legal interest protected in the area of out-of-court restructuring agreements (APE), not solely by reference to the documentary form of the act.
Evidence of the specific facts and of their impact on corporate or creditor rights is decisive when applying the precedent’s doctrine to another case.

Citation: CNCom., Sala B, «Romi S.R.L. s/ acuerdo preconcursal», 31/10/2005 — Jurisprudencia societaria y comercial

Practical application

It is central to designing robust APEs and anticipating objections.

Frequently asked questions

What is the main takeaway from the case?

The case emphasized that confirmation is not automatic: the court retains authority to review legality, voting majorities, treatment of creditors, and the absence of abuse.

Does the rule apply automatically today?

No. The current statutory framework and the specific facts must be verified. Historical precedents retain doctrinal value, but later reforms may alter how they apply.

What should be proven in similar litigation?

The relevant corporate or commercial documentation, the parties’ conduct, the specific harm, and the facts connecting that harm to the central issue in the case: The constitutionality, confirmation, and judicial review of an out-of-court restructuring agreement.

Informational commentary on a published ruling; it does not constitute advice nor guarantee an outcome. Application to a case depends on its circumstances.

Do you need advice on this matter?

The firm is headquartered in Buenos Aires, Argentina, and advises clients worldwide.

Contact the firm