Corporate case law

Unión Com S.R.L. c/ Cortona y Cortona S.C.A. y otro (National Commercial Court of Appeals, Chamber E, 21/06/2006)

Characterization and interpretation of business relationships and proof of the scope of the obligations assumed. The Commercial Court of Appeals applied standards of good faith, subsequent conduct, and the parties’ professional status when interpreting the commercial transaction.

CNCom., Sala E21/06/2006

Case caption

«Unión Com S.R.L. c/ Cortona y Cortona S.C.A. y otro»

What was at issue

Characterization and interpretation of business relationships and proof of the scope of the obligations assumed.

What was decided

The Commercial Court of Appeals applied standards of good faith, subsequent conduct, and the parties’ professional status when interpreting the commercial transaction.

Extractable criterion

The Commercial Court of Appeals applied standards of good faith, subsequent conduct, and the parties’ professional status when interpreting the commercial transaction.
The holding should be read in light of the legal interest protected in the area of commercial contracts, not solely by reference to the documentary form of the act.
Evidence of the specific facts and of their impact on corporate or creditor rights is decisive when applying the precedent’s doctrine to another case.

Citation: CNCom., Sala E, «Unión Com S.R.L. c/ Cortona y Cortona S.C.A. y otro», 21/06/2006 — Jurisprudencia societaria y comercial

Practical application

It is useful for contracts between businesses where documentation is fragmented or the parties have an ongoing course of dealing.

Frequently asked questions

What is the main takeaway from the case?

The Commercial Court of Appeals applied standards of good faith, subsequent conduct, and the parties’ professional status when interpreting the commercial transaction.

Does the rule apply automatically today?

No. The current statutory framework and the specific facts must be verified. Historical precedents retain doctrinal value, but later reforms may alter how they apply.

What should be proven in similar litigation?

The relevant corporate or commercial documentation, the parties’ conduct, the specific harm, and the facts connecting that harm to the central issue in the case: Characterization and interpretation of business relationships and proof of the scope of the obligations assumed.

Informational commentary on a published ruling; it does not constitute advice nor guarantee an outcome. Application to a case depends on its circumstances.

Do you need advice on this matter?

The firm is headquartered in Buenos Aires, Argentina, and advises clients worldwide.

Contact the firm