Blasco SchneiderLegal & Corporate Counsel
Home›Lawyers›Shareholder Disputes and Corporate Litigation›Defending Majority Shareholders Against Abusive Challenges

Defending Majority Shareholders Against Abusive Challenges

In corporate litigation, the available rights and remedies turn on provable facts and the governing corporate documents. Majority shareholders may face challenges to decisions that were lawfully adopted. Defense must rely on records and demonstrable compliance, rather than criticism of the claimant.

What to keep in mind

Check notices, minutes, votes, disclosure and business reasons, distinguishing correctable defects from unfounded allegations.

Majority status does not excuse conflicts of interest or disregard for minority rights.

Distinctions often confused

A well-founded challenge and abuse of process are different matters requiring evidence.

Frequently asked questions

Can a meeting be challenged merely because someone disagrees with its outcome?
Disagreement alone is insufficient; a relevant legal defect must be identified.
Would a second meeting ratifying the resolution resolve the problem?
It depends on the defect and consequences; ratification may not cure everything retroactively.

Informational content. It is not a substitute for professional advice.