Removal of a general-partnership manager (art. 129 LGS)
A manager, whether or not a partner and even if named in the constitutive instrument, may be removed by majority at any time without cause unless otherwise agreed.
What article 129
Article 129 governs removal of the manager: majority removal without cause as the default, contractual just-cause protection, and withdrawal rights in certain cases.
A manager, whether or not a partner, even if appointed in the constitutive instrument, may be removed by majority decision at any time without stating cause, unless otherwise agreed.
Where the constitutive instrument requires just cause, the manager shall remain in office until a judicial decision if the existence of such cause is denied, without prejudice to provisional removal under Section XIV of Chapter I.
Any partner may seek judicial removal alleging just cause. Partners dissenting from removal of a manager whose appointment was an express condition of formation have a right of withdrawal.
Source: Law 19,550, art. 129 — InfoLEG (updated official text)
Commentary
The default is free removal by majority. A contractual just-cause clause gives the manager temporary continuity until judicial determination, subject to precautionary suspension.
If the appointment was an express condition of formation, removal changes a fundamental contractual premise and gives dissenting partners a withdrawal right.
Distinctions often confused
Practical impact
Partnership agreements should state whether manager removal requires just cause and address withdrawal consequences where the appointment was a condition of formation.
Frequently asked questions
Can a general-partnership manager be removed without cause?
Do you need advice on this matter?
The firm is headquartered in Buenos Aires, Argentina, and advises clients worldwide.
Contact the firm