Controlled and affiliated companies (LGS art. 33)
Section 33 of the General Companies Law defines when one company controls another - through the votes needed to determine the corporate will or through dominant influence - and when companies are affiliated - where one holds more than 10% of another's capital. It also requires notice of holdings above 25%.
What article 33
Section 33 defines control (legal internal control and de facto internal control) and corporate affiliation, key concepts for corporate groups, controlling-person liability (art. 54), and consolidation.
A company shall be considered controlled where another company, directly or through another company that it also controls: 1) holds an interest, on any basis, carrying the votes necessary to determine the corporate will at meetings of members or ordinary shareholders' meetings; 2) exercises dominant influence as a result of shares, quotas or interests held, or because of special relationships existing between the companies.
Affiliated companies. For purposes of Section IX of this chapter, companies shall be considered affiliated where one holds more than ten percent (10%) of the capital of another. A company holding more than twenty-five percent (25%) of the capital of another shall notify it so that its next ordinary shareholders' meeting may take note of the fact.
Source: Law 19,550, art. 33 - InfoLEG (updated official text)
Commentary
The article distinguishes two forms of control: legal internal control (holding the votes necessary to determine the corporate will) and de facto internal control (dominant influence arising from the shareholding or special relationships). A majority of capital is not required; the votes actually needed in practice are enough.
An affiliation arises above 10% of another company's capital; above 25%, a notice duty arises so the investee's ordinary meeting can take note. These concepts lead into corporate-group issues: controlling-person liability (art. 54), related-party transactions and consolidated financial statements.
Distinctions often confused
Practical impact
Correctly identifying control and affiliation is essential in due diligence, controlling-person liability under article 54, and transactions within an economic group. Exceeding 25% triggers the notice requirement.
Frequently asked questions
When does one company control another?
What level of ownership constitutes affiliation?
Do you need advice on this matter?
The firm is headquartered in Buenos Aires, Argentina, and advises clients worldwide.
Contact the firm